A fair comparison starts with the task
Before comparing models or review workflows, define the work and what would count as success.
Read the articleThe project
Mixture of Models explores how AI models can check each other's work. It runs manually today, using prompts and saved model rounds. The planned ring gives models turns on a shared draft and records claims, disagreements, and checks.
01 / Where the project stands
Working now
Prompts and saved model rounds, with a person moving the work between models and deciding what to keep.
Planned architecture
Models take turns on a shared draft, keeping a record of individual claims, disagreements, and checks.
Next milestone
Connect the turn-taking loop and claim record to one checker tool, then inspect a complete run.
02 / The purpose
A useful review should point to something specific: a missed requirement, an unsupported claim, or a disagreement that needs a check. The project is about organizing that work and keeping the reasons behind the result visible.
Start with the task, its requirements, and the claims that affect the result.
Keep independent starting answers and record the issues raised during review.
Use sources and direct checks where applicable, with human judgment for the final decision.
03 / The planned ring
First, models answer independently. Then they take turns reviewing a shared draft and its claim record. Applicable tool checks and unresolved questions stay with the work.
Explore the ring04 / From the Notebook
Before comparing models or review workflows, define the work and what would count as success.
Read the articleA second model should have a job, and a benefit worth the extra work.
Read the articleTurn-taking gives a review structure. The claim record keeps the reasons, checks, and disagreements that a final vote can leave out.
Read the article